Messages in this thread | | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: NIC recommendations (was Re: Repeatable 2.4.0-test13-pre4...) | Date | 1 Jan 2001 15:51:14 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <200012302301.eBUN1IF01354@pobox.com> By author: "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@pobox.com> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > In any case, tulips have been more problematic for me than 8139, pcnet32, > or 3c905c (whose reliability are all comparable IME). I've never tried > eepro100, though. (Also, I'm speaking in terms of my experiences across > all OS's which I've used the cards under, not just under Linux, although > my Linux experiences are similar to the experiences I've had overall.) >
I have used eepro100's on *a lot* of boxes, including *.kernel.org; haven't had any problems whatsoever any time recently.
-hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |