lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectNIC recommendations (was Re: Repeatable 2.4.0-test13-pre4...)
    Date
    Andrew Morton wrote:
    > The 3c905C is a well manufactured and very feature-rich NIC which at
    > present appears to have fewer problem reports than eepro100, 8139 or tulip.

    3c905c is a bit expensive, though. pcnet32 cards also work very well for
    me, and are less expensive. The 905c could be a better card (I don't
    really know), but pcnet32's might be more cost-effective, depending
    on your needs. (I've seen pcnet32-based cards selling for $15-20, and
    I bought a new 10-pack (of HP NightDirector 10/100's) for about $36,
    including shipping, on eBay.)

    In any case, tulips have been more problematic for me than 8139, pcnet32,
    or 3c905c (whose reliability are all comparable IME). I've never tried
    eepro100, though. (Also, I'm speaking in terms of my experiences across
    all OS's which I've used the cards under, not just under Linux, although
    my Linux experiences are similar to the experiences I've had overall.)

    Anyway, those are my experiences and recommendations. YMMV. :)

    -Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:4.549 / U:0.032 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site