lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: thread rant

On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:

> Why? I would say that bad thing about SysV shared memory is that it's
> _not_ sufficiently filesystem-thing - a special API where 'create a
> file on ramfs and bloody mmap() it' would be sufficient. Why bother
> with special sets of syscalls?

what i mean is that i dont like the cleanup issues associated with SysV
shared memory - eg. it can hang around even if all users have exited, so
auto-cleanup of resources is not possible.

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.070 / U:0.952 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site