[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: thread rant

On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> well, Linux SysV shared memory indeed has a 'software version' of
> pagetables, this way if one process faults in a new page (because all
> pages are unmapped originally), then the new physical page address can be
> discovered by all other subsequent faults in other process contexts. It
> works just fine - the thing i dislike about SysV shared memory is not the
> VM part but its 'filesystem characteristics' - i think anonymous shared
> memory is the way to go.

Why? I would say that bad thing about SysV shared memory is that it's
_not_ sufficiently filesystem-thing - a special API where 'create a file
on ramfs and bloody mmap() it' would be sufficient. Why bother with
special sets of syscalls?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.332 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site