[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] preemptive kernel, preemptive-2.3.52-A7
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> [..] (This method differs from Andrea's
>similar 'all-inclusive' method by having a clean per-process counter.)

That's right, the the global per cpu array was a thinko and we really
_need_ the per-task info.

>i've also introduced a new light-weight 'IRQ-atomic' increment and
>decrement method in atomic.h, because ->may_preempt has to be

Could you describe which race you are talking about? I can't see any race
on such field.

>[..] is this what we want?

I think yes.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.165 / U:6.260 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site