Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Dec 2000 19:45:32 +0100 (CET) | From | Igmar Palsenberg <> | Subject | Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? |
| |
> > Agree that it is different. But it confuses people to have two > > idle-tasks. I suggest that we throw it one big pile, unless having a > > separate apm idle task has a purpose. > > You can't do that. Doing it this way is _way_ better for system > stability, because kidle-apmd sometimes dies due to APM > bug. kidle-apmd dying is recoverable error; swapper dieing is as fatal > as it can be.
Hmm.. Means two idle task then :)
Igmar
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |