[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kapm-idled : is this a bug?

> > What's the problem with using PID 0 as the idle task ? That's 'standard'
> > with OS'ses that display the idle task.
> Linux has already another thread with pid 0, called "swapper" which is
> in fact idle. kidle-apmd is different beast.

Agree that it is different. But it confuses people to have two
idle-tasks. I suggest that we throw it one big pile, unless having a
separate apm idle task has a purpose.

> Pavel


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.117 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site