Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:00:04 +0100 (CET) | From | Igmar Palsenberg <> | Subject | Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? |
| |
> > What's the problem with using PID 0 as the idle task ? That's 'standard' > > with OS'ses that display the idle task. > > Linux has already another thread with pid 0, called "swapper" which is > in fact idle. kidle-apmd is different beast.
Agree that it is different. But it confuses people to have two idle-tasks. I suggest that we throw it one big pile, unless having a separate apm idle task has a purpose.
> Pavel
Igmar
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |