Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:18:27 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3 |
| |
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:54:50AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:47:39AM +0200, Krzysztof Sierota wrote: > > > Marcelo Tosati assembled a kernel for us that had Andrea Arcangeli patches > > > applied and some other stuff that we needed, and the machines are stable > > > > I recommend using 2.2.18pre15aa1 (without using nfsv3 in production for now). > > Why, specifically, no NFSv3? Do you have a reason or just paranoia? :)
I've a bug report pending for NFSv3 on 2.2.18pre15aa1, it's not paranoia. But I'm not really talking about 2.2.18pre15, it may be a bug in the aa patchkit. OTOH Andi couldn't reproduce it I will try soon too.
> I've tested 2.2.18pre15 (w/out 'aa1') against FreeBSD, Solaris, and > other Linux clients, and I'm very happy with the improvement over older > Linux NFS. All of my testing and real-life usage was done w/ NFSv3 > enabled.
Could you try to use 8192 r/w size? That doesn't happen with the aa patchkit either without changing the packet size.
Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |