[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:23:51PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:14:32PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:47:39AM +0200, Krzysztof Sierota wrote:
> > > Marcelo Tosati assembled a kernel for us that had Andrea Arcangeli
> > > patches applied and some other stuff that we needed, and the
> > > machines are stable
> >
> > I recommend using 2.2.18pre15aa1 (without using nfsv3 in production
> > for now).
> I'd say that NOT using NFSv3 for production is nothing but folly.
> The NFSv3 that's in v2.2.18pre15 seems to work VERY fine (we've beaten

I were talking only about 2.2.18pre15aa1. Sorry if I wasn't clear.

v2.2.18pre15 has nfsv3 but it's not LFS capable. (however 2.2.18pre15
_may_ have the same problems that I got reported about 2.2.18pre15aa1
since they seems completly lfs unrelated).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.070 / U:0.700 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site