lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:47:39AM +0200, Krzysztof Sierota wrote:
> > Marcelo Tosati assembled a kernel for us that had Andrea Arcangeli patches
> > applied and some other stuff that we needed, and the machines are stable
>
> I recommend using 2.2.18pre15aa1 (without using nfsv3 in production for now).

Why, specifically, no NFSv3? Do you have a reason or just paranoia? :)

I've tested 2.2.18pre15 (w/out 'aa1') against FreeBSD, Solaris, and
other Linux clients, and I'm very happy with the improvement over older
Linux NFS. All of my testing and real-life usage was done w/ NFSv3
enabled.

Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.060 / U:9.652 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site