Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Jan 2000 14:45:36 -0800 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: [linux-usb] __initcall diff, version 2 |
| |
Hi,
I like the idea of this __initcall patch for USB. However, I've searched other 2.3.4x drivers and found very little use of __initcall.
Is this because __initcall is relatively new, or that there are problems with it? If problems, what kinds of problems?
Thanks, Randy
Pavel Machek wrote: > > This patch touches only simple drivers. It also does not touch stuff > outside drivers/usb -- but we now rely on link order for this to > work. (But as linus himself decided to rely on link order, and other > parts of kernel do it, too, it is probably ok). This patch does not > touch problematic drivers that I can not test [to be on the safe > side]. > > Pavel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |