Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:33:06 +0100 | From | Alexandre Belloni <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND |
| |
On 05/03/2015 at 11:04:11 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote : > > > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an > > > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver > > > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling > > > > And genuine question, should we use British English or American English > > or we don't care ? > > Have I written something that isn't valid American English there? I read > over this a few times and failed to spot anything obvious. > > I'm happy to change for consistency, I generally assume that's the most > important thing.
I'd say signalling vs signaling. I actually had to look up which one was correct. I'm personally using Incorrect/Broken English so I'm definitely not here to give lessons.
-- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
| |