lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND
    On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:17:29PM +0000, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
    > tiny tiny nitpick:
    >
    > On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote :
    > > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
    > > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
    > ^ an

    Whoops.

    Rafael, are you happy to fix that up, or would you like me to resend?

    > > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an
    > > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver
    > > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling
    >
    > And genuine question, should we use British English or American English
    > or we don't care ?

    Have I written something that isn't valid American English there? I read
    over this a few times and failed to spot anything obvious.

    I'm happy to change for consistency, I generally assume that's the most
    important thing.

    Mark.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2015-03-05 12:21    [W:2.412 / U:0.196 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site