Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:04:11 +0000 | From | Mark Rutland <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND |
| |
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:17:29PM +0000, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > tiny tiny nitpick: > > On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote : > > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share > > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by > ^ an
Whoops.
Rafael, are you happy to fix that up, or would you like me to resend?
> > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an > > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver > > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling > > And genuine question, should we use British English or American English > or we don't care ?
Have I written something that isn't valid American English there? I read over this a few times and failed to spot anything obvious.
I'm happy to change for consistency, I generally assume that's the most important thing.
Mark.
| |