Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Mar 2015 23:17:29 +0100 | From | Alexandre Belloni <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND |
| |
tiny tiny nitpick:
On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote : > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by ^ an
> +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling
And genuine question, should we use British English or American English or we don't care ?
-- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
| |