Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:31:21 -0700 | Subject | Re: sched: Fix signedness bug in yield_to() | From | Shuah Khan <> |
| |
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote: > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/linus/;a=commit;h=c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d > Commit: c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d > Parent: e0a79f529d5ba2507486d498b25da40911d95cf6 > Author: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > AuthorDate: Tue Feb 5 14:37:51 2013 +0300 > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> > CommitDate: Tue Feb 5 12:59:29 2013 +0100 > > sched: Fix signedness bug in yield_to() > > In 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when source and > target runqueue has one task" we changed this to store -ESRCH so > it needs to be signed.
Dan, Ingo,
I can't find the 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when source and target runqueue has one task" in the latest Linus's git. Am I missing something.
The current kenel/sched/core.c doesn't have the code from the associated patch https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2016651/
> bool __sched yield_to(struct task_struct *p, bool preempt) > { > @@ -4303,6 +4306,15 @@ bool __sched yield_to(struct task_struct *p, bool preempt) > > again: > p_rq = task_rq(p); > + /* > + * If we're the only runnable task on the rq and target rq also > + * has only one task, there's absolutely no point in yielding. > + */ > + if (rq->nr_running == 1 && p_rq->nr_running == 1) { > + yielded = -ESRCH; > + goto out_irq; > + }
Without the 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when source and target runqueue has one task", do you need this change?
Am I missing something?
-- Shuah
| |