Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:35:03 +0530 | Subject | Re: sched: Fix signedness bug in yield_to() | From | Raghavendra KT <> |
| |
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > > * Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Linux Kernel Mailing List >> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote: >> > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/linus/;a=commit;h=c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d >> > Commit: c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d >> > Parent: e0a79f529d5ba2507486d498b25da40911d95cf6 >> > Author: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> >> > AuthorDate: Tue Feb 5 14:37:51 2013 +0300 >> > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> >> > CommitDate: Tue Feb 5 12:59:29 2013 +0100 >> > >> > sched: Fix signedness bug in yield_to() >> > >> > In 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when source and >> > target runqueue has one task" we changed this to store -ESRCH so >> > it needs to be signed. >> >> Dan, Ingo, >> >> I can't find the 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when >> source and target runqueue has one task" in the latest Linus's >> git. Am I missing something. >> >> The current kenel/sched/core.c doesn't have the code from the >> associated patch https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2016651/ > > As per the lkml discussion that one was supposed to go upstream > via the KVM tree. Marcelo? >
It is going via KVM tree. (as per Gleb's pull request)
| |