[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ehci dynamic debug problem
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:

> > > Does it make sense now?
> >
> > No. What happens if dynamic debug is enabled for one line that calls
> > dbg_port_buf() but not for another? There's no way to avoid the string
> > formatting in both lines, even though one of them discards the result.
> That's why I said in my initial mail:
> Does dynamic debug offer an "is the message two lines below enabled" test?
> What I meant is that dbg_port() could test if it
> needs to call dbg_port_buf() for this call site.

Oh. As far as I know, that's not possible.

> Anyway, maybe the dbg_*_buf() are not called often enough to worry?

Probably not.

> If you're OK with "#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)"
> then maybe you should just do that?

Yes, that sounds best.

Alan Stern

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-13 21:43    [W:0.057 / U:1.616 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site