Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Aug 2010 20:27:24 +1000 (EST) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: [AppArmor #7 0/13] AppArmor security module |
| |
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Note that I added the patch below to update AA against the latest > > version of path_truncate: > > Ok, so now we have two name-based "security" modules. Can we at least > drop TOMOYO? That seems to have all apparmor disadvantages plus some > more...
No. The policy is that any security module which implements an access control scheme and meets a well-defined security goal, and passes technical review, may be merged.
aka, The Arjan Protocol:
http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Documenting_Security_Module_Intent
-- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
| |