lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [AppArmor #7 0/13] AppArmor security module
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Pavel Machek wrote:

> > Note that I added the patch below to update AA against the latest
> > version of path_truncate:
>
> Ok, so now we have two name-based "security" modules. Can we at least
> drop TOMOYO? That seems to have all apparmor disadvantages plus some
> more...

No. The policy is that any security module which implements an access
control scheme and meets a well-defined security goal, and passes
technical review, may be merged.

aka, The Arjan Protocol:

http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Documenting_Security_Module_Intent


--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-05 12:31    [W:0.361 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site