[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [AppArmor #7 0/13] AppArmor security module

2010/8/5 Pavel Machek <>:
> On Fri 2010-07-30 09:05:23, James Morris wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, John Johansen wrote:
>> > This is the seveth general posting of the newest version of the
>> > AppArmor security module it has been rewritten to use the security_path
>> > hooks instead of the previous vfs approach.  The current implementation
>> > is aimed at being as semantically close to previous versions of AppArmor
>> > as possible while using the existing LSM infrastructure.
>> Applied to
>> git://
>> Please carry out any further development against the above tree.
>> Note that I added the patch below to update AA against the latest
>> version of path_truncate:
> Ok, so now we have two name-based "security" modules. Can we at least
> drop TOMOYO? That seems to have all apparmor disadvantages plus some
> more...

Great idea! I suggest also to throw away the unnecessary filesystems.
Ext3 is great - who needs Ext4 or XFS?

Jan III Sobieski
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-05 12:01    [W:0.086 / U:1.644 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site