[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [AppArmor #7 0/13] AppArmor security module

    2010/8/5 Pavel Machek <>:
    > On Fri 2010-07-30 09:05:23, James Morris wrote:
    >> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, John Johansen wrote:
    >> > This is the seveth general posting of the newest version of the
    >> > AppArmor security module it has been rewritten to use the security_path
    >> > hooks instead of the previous vfs approach.  The current implementation
    >> > is aimed at being as semantically close to previous versions of AppArmor
    >> > as possible while using the existing LSM infrastructure.
    >> Applied to
    >> git://
    >> Please carry out any further development against the above tree.
    >> Note that I added the patch below to update AA against the latest
    >> version of path_truncate:
    > Ok, so now we have two name-based "security" modules. Can we at least
    > drop TOMOYO? That seems to have all apparmor disadvantages plus some
    > more...

    Great idea! I suggest also to throw away the unnecessary filesystems.
    Ext3 is great - who needs Ext4 or XFS?

    Jan III Sobieski
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-05 12:01    [W:0.020 / U:11.920 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site