Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:24:32 +0200 | | From | Pavel Machek <> | | Subject | Re: [AppArmor #7 0/13] AppArmor security module |
| |
On Fri 2010-07-30 09:05:23, James Morris wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, John Johansen wrote: > > > This is the seveth general posting of the newest version of the > > AppArmor security module it has been rewritten to use the security_path > > hooks instead of the previous vfs approach. The current implementation > > is aimed at being as semantically close to previous versions of AppArmor > > as possible while using the existing LSM infrastructure. > > Applied to > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next > > Please carry out any further development against the above tree. > > Note that I added the patch below to update AA against the latest > version of path_truncate:
Ok, so now we have two name-based "security" modules. Can we at least drop TOMOYO? That seems to have all apparmor disadvantages plus some more...
-- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
|  |