lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [AppArmor #7 0/13] AppArmor security module
On Fri 2010-07-30 09:05:23, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, John Johansen wrote:
>
> > This is the seveth general posting of the newest version of the
> > AppArmor security module it has been rewritten to use the security_path
> > hooks instead of the previous vfs approach. The current implementation
> > is aimed at being as semantically close to previous versions of AppArmor
> > as possible while using the existing LSM infrastructure.
>
> Applied to
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next
>
> Please carry out any further development against the above tree.
>
> Note that I added the patch below to update AA against the latest
> version of path_truncate:

Ok, so now we have two name-based "security" modules. Can we at least
drop TOMOYO? That seems to have all apparmor disadvantages plus some
more...

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-05 08:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans