lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] wireless: wl12xx, fix lock imbalance
On 07/13/2009 11:49 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 23:44 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
>>> I've had local hacks
>>> many times to make sparse aware of mutexes, is there a reason they are
>>> not annotated with __acquire(s)/__release(s) like spinlocks etc.?
>>
>> Mutexes are often locked/unlocked interprocedural which I think sparse
>> can't do much about.
>
> Well, you annotate those functions too, of course.

Sorry, I don't understand. What functions I annotate?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-13 23:53    [W:0.174 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site