Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:51:51 +0200 | From | Jiri Slaby <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] wireless: wl12xx, fix lock imbalance |
| |
On 07/13/2009 11:49 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 23:44 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >>> I've had local hacks >>> many times to make sparse aware of mutexes, is there a reason they are >>> not annotated with __acquire(s)/__release(s) like spinlocks etc.? >> >> Mutexes are often locked/unlocked interprocedural which I think sparse >> can't do much about. > > Well, you annotate those functions too, of course.
Sorry, I don't understand. What functions I annotate?
| |