Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] wireless: wl12xx, fix lock imbalance | From | Johannes Berg <> | Date | Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:49:49 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 23:44 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > I've had local hacks > > many times to make sparse aware of mutexes, is there a reason they are > > not annotated with __acquire(s)/__release(s) like spinlocks etc.? > > Mutexes are often locked/unlocked interprocedural which I think sparse > can't do much about.
Well, you annotate those functions too, of course.
johannes [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |