lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: x86: 4kstacks default
    Date
    On Sunday 27 April 2008 21:27, Jörn Engel wrote:
    > On Tue, 22 April 2008 11:28:19 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
    > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 09:51:02PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
    > >
    > > > Why xfs code is said to be 5 times bigger than e.g. reiserfs?
    > > > Does it have to be that big?
    > >
    > > If we cut the bulkstat code out, the handle interface, the
    > > preallocation, the journalled quota, the delayed allocation, all the
    > > runtime validation, the shutdown code, the debug code, the tracing
    > > code, etc, then we might get down to the same size reiser....
    >
    > Just noticed this bit of FUD. Last time I did some static analysis on
    > stack usage, reiserfs alone would blow away 3k, while xfs was somewhere
    > below.

    I'm sorry, but it's not what I said.
    I didn't say reiserfs eats less stack. I don't know.
    I said it is smaller.

    reiserfs/* 821474 bytes
    xfs/* 3019689 bytes
    --
    vda
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-28 01:05    [W:0.021 / U:30.096 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site