Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:07:00 +0100 | From | Jarek Poplawski <> | Subject | Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in net_rx_action |
| |
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:18:12AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: ... > Anyway, the accusation is that lockdep is busted, in that it doesn't realise that > local_irq_disable() blocks softirqs.
Usually lockdep gets this right, so I've some doubts too. But here it's not only about softirqs; this:
> >> Mar 25 19:48:46 better kernel: #1: (target_list_lock){--..}, at: [<c0399c0d>]
means lockdep saw hardirqs enabled while acquiring/holding this lock.
Jarek P.
| |