lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 29 Jul 2007 22:47:16 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
* John <darknessenvelops@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ingo-
> 
> Why not perform the same test using the native linux Q3 client to 
> compare numbers to wine? [...]

I regularly test native Linux games on CFS, and they all behave well. 
While waiting for more detailed data from Kasper i was looking for 
atypical stuff in Kasper's description about what his workload involves, 
and what looked a bit atypical was that Kasper's workload also involved 
gaming under Wine:

> > > my test subjects are quake(s), world of warcraft via wine, unreal 
> > > tournament 2004. [...]

and Wine is a more complex server/client scenario instead of a single 
(and simple) standalone Quake3 binary that the Linux binary does. So it 
looked more interesting from a scheduler workload (and scheduler 
regression) POV. In any case i'll need more info from Kasper.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-29 22:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2008