[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
    On 7/30/07, John <> wrote:
    > I understand that, I was just wondering if the FPS scales the same natively
    > vs. Wine as I typically only run native games. I have been hesitant to move
    > over to CFS due to reports of 3D issues and wanted to see if you had numbers
    > in regards to CFS vs. SD.

    John, the numbers Ingo makes and the numbers you make will no doubt be
    different (unless by some fantastic freak of nature you both have
    identical systems). Take this opportunity to do this testing yourself
    so in case there is some improvement to make, it can be done for
    2.6.23. Nobody can benchmark your system but you.

    Remember to set CONFIG_HZ to 1000

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-30 03:23    [W:0.019 / U:1.168 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site