Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:54:59 -0400 | | From | Kenneth Prugh <> | | Subject | Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1) |
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> <large snip>
Hello, I have a gaming rig and would love to help benchmark with my copy
of UT2004(E6600 Core2 and a 7950GTO card). Or if you have anything else
that would better serve as a benchmark I could grab it and try.
The only problem is I don't know what 2 kernels I should be using to
test the schedulers. I assume 2.6.23-rc1 for CFS, but what about SD?
--
Kenneth Prugh
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |