![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Hans de Goede wrote: >> In order to be able to better test / develop this I've bought 2 cheap >> such keyboards today, one ps2 and one both usb and ps2 capable. >> >> When comparing usb vs ps2 / testing the keycodes generated for the easy >> access >> keys on my trust (microsoft compatible) keyboard. I noticed the homepage >> key sends keycode 150 with ps2 and 172 with USB, or for those who don't >> know the keycodes by head with ps2 it sends KEY_WWW and with usb it >> sends KEY_HOMEPAGE > > I just tested this using Microsoft Natural Keyboard Pro, which is a > dual-mode (USB-PS/2) keyboard. > > This key is labelled Web/Home and has a picture of a house on the keycap. > > In PS/2 mode it reports E0 32 which gets converted to keycode 150. > In USB mode it reports E0 02 which gets converted to keycode 172. > Thanks, that confirms that the ps/2 translation (which assumes a microsoft or compatible keyboard) is wrong. > I don't know if it's the keyboard itself that's being inconsistent, or > if it is the table in usbkbd.c that's broken (in which case it should be > fixed to be consistent with the keyboard in PS/2 mode.) > See below. >> I personally believe that the usb behaviour is correct and that the ps/2 >> code should be modified to match for consistency. The ps/2 scancode to >> keycode mapping is set up to handle easy access / internet keys for >> microsoft compatible keyboards. So what is the right code to send here, >> tricky, see: >> http://www.s2.com.br/s2arquivos/361/Imagens/555Image.jpg >> http://www.keyboardco.com/keyboard_images/microsoft_ergonomic_keyboard_4000_black_usb_large.jpg >> >> The logo on the key is a homepage logo, the text below is www/homepage. >> So what to send? I believe that for consistency with the usb codes send >> it should be KEY_HOMEPAGE, but thats based on a sample of 1 usb >> keyboard. Input on what other usb keyboards send for the key with the >> homepage iocn is very much welcome. > > You seem to be of the opinion that "usb behaviour is correct", but don't > give any motivation why usb should take precedence. Offhand, I would > expect there to be fewer translation layers for PS/2 and would therefore > assume PS/2 is more inherently correct. > I'm of the opinion that the USB behaviour is correct, because usb generates the 172 / KEY_HOMEPAGE in accordance with: http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/Hut1_12.pdf Page 84 Where as in the ps2 world there is no official scancode mapping for these special keys, hence I talk about microsoft and compatibles. Also the number of layers of translation in both cases is just 1: one table (ps2) versus one switch statement (usb) Regards, Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-13 07:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||