![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 5/21/07, Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com> wrote: > yes and no. in that commit, I automatically create n+1 device when > loop device n is created, allergically was tested to be fine with > casual usage of "losetup" and "mount -o loop". However, there is a > bug in that commit when loop.c was compiled as a module. And when Al > fixed it, he also removed that magic "n+1" trick. > > Nevertheless, yes, I'm guilty of introducing the new behavior. The easiest way is to reinstate max_loop and create "max_loop" device up front at module load time. However, that will lose all the "fancy on-demand device instantiation feature". So I propose we do the following: 1. have the module honor "max_loop" parameter and create that many device upfront on module load (max_loop will also be a hard max) iff user specify the parameter. 2. if max_loop is not specified, default create 8 loop device. User can extent more loop device by create device node themselves and have kernel automatically instantiate loop device on-demand. Is this acceptable? Patch in a bit. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-21 18:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||