Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:34:43 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc5 x86 architecture no longer Oopses... |
| |
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:12:07 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > I'd suggest that we add a local_read_flags() along with > > local_save_flags(). Then I can merge the parts of the patch which > > don't get destroyed by ongoing churn and then we can come in and clean > > up the stragglers later. > > ah, indeed. > > like the patch below? (Only local_save_flags() should be used by drivers > - but i stuck in the other variants as well for completeness.) > > Ingo > > --------------------> > Subject: migration helpers for local_save_flags => local_read_flags rename > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > > prepare for renaming of all local_save_flags variants to local_read_flags, > via migration helpers, as suggested by Andrew Morton. > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > --- > include/linux/irqflags.h | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > Index: linux-x86.q/include/linux/irqflags.h > =================================================================== > --- linux-x86.q.orig/include/linux/irqflags.h > +++ linux-x86.q/include/linux/irqflags.h > @@ -93,4 +93,13 @@ > #define irqs_disabled_flags(flags) raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags) > #endif /* CONFIG_X86 */ > > +/* > + * Migration helpers - the proper API is the local_read_flags API. > + * Will go away in v2.6.26. > + */ > +#define local_save_flags local_read_flags > +#define __local_save_flags __local_read_flags > +#define raw_local_save_flags raw_local_read_flags > +#define __raw_local_save_flags __raw_local_read_flags > +
Looks good. We also have local_irq_save(), raw_local_irq_save() and __raw_local_irq_save() which might or might not disable interrupts. (Do we really need three flavours of these?)
I guess that people's understanding of spin_lock_irqsave() (note the irqsave versus irq_save inconsistency) is sufficiently good for nobody to get tripped up by local_irq_save(). But it's a poor name nonetheless.
It'd be nice to move away from macros too if poss?
| |