![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> >Second, I should point out again that it is unfortunate that Linus did not >retain for himself the exclusive right to modify the Linux kernel license. >If some real problem ever does emerge in the GPLv2 as applies to Linux, it >will be extremely difficult to resolve. > Easy to resolve, but difficult to implement: remove the offending code (and rewrite). >This is probably going to be controversial, but Linus should seriously >consider adding a clause that those who contribute to the kernel from >now on consent to allow him to modify the license on their current >contributions and all past contributions, amending the Linux kernel >license as appropriate. Now that you raise it: I think developers can already have done that if they wish - properly name author and conditions who may possibly change the license to what. Not that I have seen such code yet, but you never know. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-09-23 06:13 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||