lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 1/9] extents for ext4


> Hi!
>
> > > AM> - The existing comments could benefit from some rework by a
> > > AM> native English speaker.
> > >
> > > could someone assist here, please?
> >
> > See if this helps.
> > Patch applies on top of all ext4 patches from
> > http://ext2.sourceforge.net/48bitext3/patches/latest/.
>
> > --- linux-2618-rc4-ext4.orig/include/linux/ext4_fs_extents.h
> > +++ linux-2618-rc4-ext4/include/linux/ext4_fs_extents.h
> > @@ -22,29 +22,29 @@
> > #include <linux/ext4_fs.h>
> >
> > /*
> > - * with AGRESSIVE_TEST defined capacity of index/leaf blocks
> > - * become very little, so index split, in-depth growing and
> > - * other hard changes happens much more often
> > - * this is for debug purposes only
> > + * With AGRESSIVE_TEST defined, the capacity of index/leaf blocks
> > + * becomes very small, so index split, in-depth growing and
> > + * other hard changes happen much more often.
> > + * This is for debug purposes only.
> > */
> > #define AGRESSIVE_TEST_
>
> Using _ for disabling is unusual/nasty. Can't we simply #undef it?

Yes, that's the right thing to do.
The ext4dev people should do that. :)

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-15 23:29    [W:0.027 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site