Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:19:01 -0700 | From | Mingming Cao <> | Subject | Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 1/9] extents for ext4 |
| |
Randy Dunlap wrote: > >>Hi! >> >> >>>> AM> - The existing comments could benefit from some rework by a >>>> AM> native English speaker. >>>> >>>>could someone assist here, please? >>> >>>See if this helps. >>>Patch applies on top of all ext4 patches from >>>http://ext2.sourceforge.net/48bitext3/patches/latest/. >> >>>--- linux-2618-rc4-ext4.orig/include/linux/ext4_fs_extents.h >>>+++ linux-2618-rc4-ext4/include/linux/ext4_fs_extents.h >>>@@ -22,29 +22,29 @@ >>> #include <linux/ext4_fs.h> >>> >>> /* >>>- * with AGRESSIVE_TEST defined capacity of index/leaf blocks >>>- * become very little, so index split, in-depth growing and >>>- * other hard changes happens much more often >>>- * this is for debug purposes only >>>+ * With AGRESSIVE_TEST defined, the capacity of index/leaf blocks >>>+ * becomes very small, so index split, in-depth growing and >>>+ * other hard changes happen much more often. >>>+ * This is for debug purposes only. >>> */ >>> #define AGRESSIVE_TEST_ >> >>Using _ for disabling is unusual/nasty. Can't we simply #undef it? > > > Yes, that's the right thing to do. > The ext4dev people should do that. :) >
Okey, I will fixed that. thanks. > --- > ~Randy
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |