Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:05:26 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory |
| |
* Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@cpushare.com> wrote:
> > which quite likely wont be provable in the foreseeable future). > > Please mention a _single_ bug that could allow you to escape the > seccomp jail in linux since 2.4.0 on x86 and x86-64 (and with escape I > don't mean sniffing data with mmx not being backwards compatible, or > f00f DoS, I mean executing code into the host as user nobody). I'm not > aware of a _single_ seccomp bug that could allow you to escape the > seccomp jail since 2.4.0 and probably much earlier.
ugh? Where do i claim any such thing?
while we are at it, please mention a single ptrace bug in the same timeframe that could allow a bytecode 'client' to escape a ptrace TRACE_SYSCALL jail at will.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |