[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory
    On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 03:44:28PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > let me put it another way: this is a security hole. seccomp is now a way
    > to evade the auditing of read/write syscalls done to an opened file.
    > Please fix this.

    This is not true, the auditing of read/write will work fine on the
    seccomp task too. I guess you overlooked something in the code.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.018 / U:6.984 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site