[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 03:44:28PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> let me put it another way: this is a security hole. seccomp is now a way
> to evade the auditing of read/write syscalls done to an opened file.
> Please fix this.

This is not true, the auditing of read/write will work fine on the
seccomp task too. I guess you overlooked something in the code.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.140 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site