Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:00:54 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory |
| |
* Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@cpushare.com> wrote:
> This is not true, the auditing of read/write will work fine on the > seccomp task too. I guess you overlooked something in the code.
yeah, you are right - it's there. You are driving seccomp off do_syscall_trace(), which does audit_syscall_entry().
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |