lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 04 Oct 2005 22:49:03 -0700
FromMarc Perkel <>
SubjectRe: what's next for the linux kernel?

D. Hazelton wrote:

> 
>
>>Novell Netware type permissions. ACLs are a step in the right
>>direction but Linux isn't any where near where Novell was back in
>>1990. Linux lets you - for example - to delete files that you have
>>no read or write access rights to. 
>> 
>>
>
>As someone else pointed out, this is because unlinking is related to 
>your access permissions on the parent directory and not the file.
>
> 
>
Right - that's Unix "inside the box" thinking. The idea is to make the 
operating system smarter so that the user doesn't have to deal with 
what's computer friendly - but reather what makes sense to the user. 
 From a user's perspective if you have not rights to access a file then 
why should you be allowed to delete it?

Now - the idea is to create choice. If you need to emulate Unix nehavior 
for compatibility that's fine. But I would migrate away from that into a 
permissions paradygme that worked like Netware.

I started with Netware and I'm spoiled. They had it right 15 years ago 
and Linux isn't any where near what I was with Netware and DOS in 1990. 
Once you've had this kind of permission power Linux is a real big step down.

So - the thread is about the future so I say - time to fix Unix.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-05 05:51    [W:0.809 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans