Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Solving suspend-level confusion | From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> | Date | Wed, 04 Aug 2004 14:52:05 +1000 |
| |
> Hmm. That's what I was doing and do do for the remainder of the devices. > Oh well. I'll give it a try again. What would 3 do? (There was a stage > when all three implementations used 3; I've just played sheep in > changing to 4).
3 would be S3 -> suspend to RAM. We may still want to fix drivers to pass 4 as a PCI state though ;)
> It occurs to me that I'm going to need to extend the partial tree > handling anyway. When I get this working, I'm going to want to resume > only the storage devices, and haven't added code for that yet. > > Regards, > > Nigel -- Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |