lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Solving suspend-level confusion
From
Date

> Hmm. That's what I was doing and do do for the remainder of the devices.
> Oh well. I'll give it a try again. What would 3 do? (There was a stage
> when all three implementations used 3; I've just played sheep in
> changing to 4).

3 would be S3 -> suspend to RAM. We may still want to fix drivers to
pass 4 as a PCI state though ;)

> It occurs to me that I'm going to need to extend the partial tree
> handling anyway. When I get this working, I'm going to want to resume
> only the storage devices, and haven't added code for that yet.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nigel
--
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.118 / U:0.996 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site