Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:32:22 +0200 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch |
| |
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:50:17AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > the other bad thing is that there is no point for the sysctl (in 2.4 > that made no sense at all too, yeah it only makes sense for benchmarking > easily w/ and w/o the feature but it must be optimized away at the very > least with a config option for production),
as Ingo wrote, that is the plan, all that "crud" is there just to make it easy to benchmark for now. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |