lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:50:17AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> the other bad thing is that there is no point for the sysctl (in 2.4
> that made no sense at all too, yeah it only makes sense for benchmarking
> easily w/ and w/o the feature but it must be optimized away at the very
> least with a config option for production),

as Ingo wrote, that is the plan, all that "crud" is there just to make it
easy to benchmark for now.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.546 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site