[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch
    Con Kolivas wrote:
    > I've conducted some of the old fashioned Benno's latency test on this
    > patch in various sysctl configurations. This was done on top of a
    > different tree but everything else was kept static. I have to preface
    > these results by saying I don't really get the 50ms size latencies
    > normally but I'm usually unable to get better than 3ms so I wasn't sure
    > what to expect.
    > Only the both preempt off showed any "outlying" results with one spike
    > of ~20ms but the rest of the time being ~3ms. Enabling both forms of
    > preempt seemed to help a little but nothing drastic, and never below
    > 1ms. It was not universal that the latencies were better, but there was
    > a trend towards better latency. I suspect that those who are getting
    > huge latencies may see a bigger change with this patch than I did.
    > Con

    Ooops forgot to mention this was running reiserFS 3.6 on software raid0
    2x IDE with cfq elevator.

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.019 / U:46.932 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site