lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission
    I've got a question about this. A lot of times I get patches that are
    just one/two-liners and the explanation is somewhat self-explantory,
    etc. Say the patch comes to me from some patch collection maintainer,
    who got it from the original author.

    So the original person never put a Signed-off-by, and neither did the
    person who sent me the patch, should I still add the eplicit
    Signed-off-by's to the patch, and add myself, before sending it to you?

    --
    Debian - http://www.debian.org/
    Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
    Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
    WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.020 / U:119.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site