Messages in this thread | | | From | "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional | Date | Wed, 14 May 2003 16:33:14 -0700 |
| |
> From: Christopher Hoover [mailto:ch@murgatroid.com] > > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:14:46AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:32:07PM -0700, Christopher Hoover wrote: > > > Not everyone needs futex support, so it should be optional. This is > > > needed for small platforms. > > > > Looks good. I think you want to disable it unconditionally for !CONFIG_MMU. > > Good point. > > Here it is again with the config change. The previous version also had > had a Makefile typo. Plus a cond_syscall for compat_sys_futex to make > it work for CONFIG_COMPAT (untested), as pointed out by akpm.
How does this affect mm_release() in fork.c? there is a call to sys_futex(); if you make it conditional, will it break anything in there?
Iñaky Pérez-González -- Not speaking for Intel -- all opinions are my own (and my fault) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |