[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional

On Wed, 14 May 2003, Christopher Hoover wrote:
> >
> > (I ran a futex-free ppc64 kernel. It worked.)
> Yep. I'm run an ARM kernel as well. Works fine.

And do you guys actually use a recent glibc snapshot? Do you ever expect
to? Do you ever expect to run a third-party specialized web-server or
database library? All things that can use futex'es, and probably will.

I will strongly argue against making futexes conditional, simply because I
_want_ people to be able to depend on them in modern kernels. I do not
want developers to fall back on SysV semaphores just because it's too
painful for them to use the faster alternatives.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.104 / U:9.580 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site