lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
    > Personal opinion here but I know it is also held by many developers I
    > know and work with. I'd rather have a compiler that produces correct and
    > fast code but ran slow than one that produces slow or bad code and runs
    > fast. Remember compilation is done far less often than run time
    > execution.

    Yeah, I'd make that tradeoff too, but gcc 3.2 doesn't give me that.
    People keep saying it does, but I see no real evidence of it.
    Show me the money.

    M.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.020 / U:30.608 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site