Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 04 Feb 2003 07:46:45 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance |
| |
> Personal opinion here but I know it is also held by many developers I > know and work with. I'd rather have a compiler that produces correct and > fast code but ran slow than one that produces slow or bad code and runs > fast. Remember compilation is done far less often than run time > execution.
Yeah, I'd make that tradeoff too, but gcc 3.2 doesn't give me that. People keep saying it does, but I see no real evidence of it. Show me the money.
M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |