lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
    On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 07:35:06PM +0000, John Bradford wrote:

    > Maybe we should create a KGCC fork, optimise it for kernel
    > complilations, then try to get our changes merged back in to GCC
    > mainline at a later date.

    What exactly do you mean by "optimise for kernel compilations" ?

    Dave

    --
    | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
    | SuSE Labs
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.020 / U:30.456 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site