Messages in this thread | | | From | John Bradford <> | Subject | Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance | Date | Tue, 4 Feb 2003 19:35:06 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
> I'm hesitant to enter into this. But from my own experience > the issue with big companies supporting these sort of changes > in gcc have more to do with the acceptance process of changes > into gcc than a lack of desire on the large companies part.
Maybe we should create a KGCC fork, optimise it for kernel complilations, then try to get our changes merged back in to GCC mainline at a later date.
John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |