Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:46:15 +0100 | From | Vojtech Pavlik <> | Subject | Re: [patch] PIIX rewrite patch, pre-final |
| |
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:36:30PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 08:24:02AM +0100, Daniela Engert wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 07:52:58 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > > > > >> This will benifit PIIX3 chipsets? :) > > > >It should. > > > > > > Are you aware of the batches of broken PIIX3 chips ? > > > > I don't know of any IDE-related errata for the PIIX3 chip. At least > > Intel didn't publish any and there doesn't seem to be any workarounds in > > the original piix.c code, only a statement stating that the PIIX3 UDMA > > is broken, however, as far as I know, PIIX3 isn't UDMA capable at all. > > 27296302.pdf 82371SB (PIIX3) Timing Specification > 29765804.pdf INTEL 82371FB (PIIX) and 82371SB (PIIX3) SPECIFICATION UPDATE
Gee, thanks, like if I haven't read those twice over already. No mention of UDMA (or SDMA in Intel speech), or any IDE errata anyway.
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |