Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:50:41 -0800 (PST) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | Re: linux-2.4.18-modified-scsi-h.patch |
| |
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Patrick Mansfield wrote: > > > I don't see why we need the #define, or is that another patch? > > > > The define exists for the same reason that HAVE_xxx exists in > include/linux/netdevice.h and other headers: a feature test macro, so > code using this pointer can detect its presence or absence. The world > of drivers is not all in the kernel tarball, ya know ;-) > > But as I said, the macro is misnamed, it should be > HAVE_UPPER_PRIVATE_DATA or similar. > > Jeff
Hey Jeff!
Works for me, has each HBA has the need to reserve local structs and not pollute the basic kernel w/ bloat!
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick, CTO & Founder iSCSI Software Solutions Provider http://www.PyXTechnologies.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |