[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 19:29, John Alvord wrote:

> The best part about planned preemption points is that there is minimal
> state to save when an interruption occurs.

Actually, both preempt-kernel and low-latency do about the same amount
of work re saving state.

With preempt-kernel, when a task is preempted in-kernel we AND a flag
value into the preempt count. That is all we need to keep track of

With low-latency, the task state is set to TASK_RUNNING (which is a
precautionary measure). So it is about the same, although low-latency
(and lock-break) often also have to do various setup with the locks and

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.402 / U:14.116 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site