![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Is it possible to decide, now what should go into 2.4.18 (maybe -pre3) -aa or -rmap? Andrew Morten`s read-latency.patch is a clear winner for me, too. What about 00_nanosleep-5 and bootmem? The O(1) scheduler? Maybe preemption? It is disengageable so nobody should be harmed but we get the chance for wider testing. Any comments? Thanks, Dieter -- Dieter Nützel Graduate Student, Computer Science University of Hamburg Department of Computer Science @home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||